In the 2025 General Assembly, Kentucky lawmakers reduced the individual income tax rate from 4% to 3.5%, a cut that will take effect on Jan.1, 2026. That cut will cost the state budget $718 million per year.1 And it will be the third half-point cut in just four years, following a reduction from 5% to 4.5% that took effect in Jan. 2023 and a cut to 4% effective Jan. 2024. The cost of all three cuts adds up to a total of $2.15 billion annually.
Spending large amounts of money in this way is a choice that takes resources away from other opportunities. Choosing instead to put $718 million into public education, for example, would allow Kentucky to make up significant ground lost from state disinvestment in core formula funding over the last 15 years, begin to address the teacher and bus driver shortage and improve the quality of education at Kentucky schools through proven, evidence-based investments.

In this report, we provide an illustration of what $718 million more could mean for Kentucky public schools. For that cost, the state could increase the base funding component for schools, known as Support Education Excellence in Kentucky (SEEK), by an estimated 14%, to $5,212 per pupil; provide 100% funding of statutorily required school transportation costs for the first time since 2004; and restore $38 million that had been previously cut from textbooks, teacher professional development and technology.
Though districts would decide exactly how to spend the extra SEEK funds, this amount of money would make all three of the following possible:
- An average 8% raise for certified and classified employees across school districts;
- Hiring 2,658 or 5% more teachers and certified staff for smaller class sizes, restored course offerings, expansion of preschool or more counselors to address mental health needs;
- $59 million across the state for school meals, additional bus drivers and other classified staff, Family Resource and Youth Service Centers (FRYSCs) and other student support services, school safety improvements, equipment or other needs.
$718 million annually would allow schools to gain significant lost ground
While $718 million a year is less than the $1.3 billion more the state would need to put into schools to get back to inflation-adjusted 2008 funding levels — and much less the amount needed to adequately fund public education according to evidence-based studies of best practices — it is substantially more than the modest $206 million average annual increase the legislature included in the 2024-2026 state budget.2
State funding for K-12 education has failed to keep up with inflation since 2008 despite growing evidence that more funding for public schools significantly improves the lives of children, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds.3 For example, one study found that between 1972 and 2010 an increase in school spending by 10% over a 12-year period resulted in 7% higher wages and 10% higher family incomes in adulthood.4
There are many urgent uses for an additional reinvestment in Kentucky public schools. In the scenario outlined in this report, we use $89 million of the proposed additional $718 million to fully fund the state’s obligation under law to fund school transportation. The state has not met that obligation since 2004. This additional contribution helps ensure that a basic and necessary obligation of districts — to get kids to and from school on the bus — is met.
Additionally, $38 million is allocated to restore cuts that were made in textbooks, teacher professional development and technology. These expenditures are not part of the SEEK formula but are core needs that the state had until recently met its obligation to provide. The legislature entirely cut funding earmarked for textbooks and teacher professional development in 2018 and still has not funded those items in the 2024-2026 budget despite billions available in the Budget Reserve Trust Fund.
The remainder of the $718 million in this report’s scenario is put into SEEK and associated state costs. SEEK is designed to take into account disparities across the state by contributing more to districts with less property wealth and greater student needs to help reduce the gaps that would otherwise exist. State SEEK funding has declined by an inflation-adjusted 24% since 2008, making it the primary reason the gap between wealthy and poor districts now exceeds levels declared unconstitutional by the Kentucky Supreme Court under the Rose decision in 1989.5 SEEK also allows flexible funding for school districts, permitting each district to best identify how to allocate dollars based on local needs with input from educators, parents and the community.
While each district would be able to decide how to best allocate its funds, we make assumptions about how the monies will be spent to provide an illustration of the potential impacts and include additional state costs for health insurance and retirement associated with increased salaries and expanded hiring.
We assume several areas of broad need:
Provide substantial raises for all educators
Kentucky ranks 42nd among states in average teacher pay, a decline from 41st last year. And the state ranks 48th in average teacher starting salary and 49th in average pay for education support professionals.6
These numbers have also declined in real dollars over time: the average Kentucky district is paying its teachers 20% less in inflation-adjusted salary than it was in 2008.7 That decline is as high as 31% in rural counties that lack the local property wealth to generate enough in local taxes to make up for the loss of state funds. And as pay has eroded, so have benefit payments to retired school employees, which are calculated based on final average salary.8
Teacher pay has been identified as a major factor in recruitment and retention of teachers and other school employees including bus drivers and food service staff, contributing to a growing educator shortage.9 Adequate compensation is essential to high quality education and properly staffed schools.
If 60% of the $718 million funding increase outlined in this report went toward raises for certified and classified employees, it would allow an estimated average 8% raise across the state. An 8% increase in average teacher salary would increase Kentucky’s average teacher salary to $62,991, allowing the state to jump from 42nd to approximately 29th in average teacher pay. An 8% increase in pay for education support professionals would allow Kentucky to jump from 49th to 43rd.
Reduce class sizes, expand preschool and increase school counselors through hiring additional teachers and other certified staff
Lowering class sizes is a clear, evidence-backed method for improving education outcomes.10 As economist Diane Schanzenbach explains, “research supports the common-sense notion that children learn more and teachers are more effective in smaller classes.”11Class size, she says, “is an important determinant of a variety of student outcomes, ranging from test scores to broader life outcomes. Smaller classes are particularly effective at raising achievement levels of low-income and minority children.” More teachers and smaller classes allow for more individualized attention that can improve success and behavior and unlock kids’ imaginations and potential.
Another challenge more funds could help to address is a decline in course offerings due to state budget cuts. A 2018 KyPolicy survey of school superintendents found that because of post-Great Recession state budget cuts, a majority of districts reduced days in the school calendar, 35% reduced or eliminated art and music programs, 30% cut course offerings, 35% increased fees, 42% reduced student supports including afterschool programs, and 25% spent less on health services.12 A lack of state reinvestment since 2018 makes it likely those trends have continued or even worsened.
Despite the proven benefits of high-quality, universal preschool, the state only funds preschool for 4-year olds up to 160% of poverty and for 3- and 4-year olds with disabilities. And even with growing understanding of the serious mental health challenges facing many kids, 9% of Kentucky schools do not have a certified school counselor, and 46% do not meet the state target of 1 counselor for every 250 students.13
If 30% of the proposed funding increase in this report went to hire new certified employees to reduce class sizes, expand preschool, provide more mental health counselors, increase course offerings or meet other needs, it would allow the hiring of an estimated 2,658 or 5% more positions across the state.
Fill other needs including by hiring bus drivers and expanding support services like FRYSCs, free school meals and afterschool programs
In recent years, there is growing recognition that adequate nutrition is critical to student welfare and academic success.14 But in Kentucky, more than one in five kids is food insecure.15 The state has made strides in recent years to expand access to federally-funded free school breakfast and lunch programs through the Community Eligibility Provision that makes these meals free to all kids at qualifying schools.16 But access to food will be threatened by the cuts to SNAP food assistance in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBA), which directly affects eligibility for federal funding for school meals.17 These cuts will make state funding for meals critical.
School districts have many other pressing needs. FRYSCs, for example, play a vital role of connecting families with community services and resources like clothing, but FRYSC funding per student has fallen an inflation-adjusted 53% since 1991.18 And shortages of bus drivers, cafeteria workers, and other classified staff make basic services hard to deliver.19
If 10% of the additional SEEK funds in this proposal were allocated for these needs, it would mean $59 million more for districts.
Reinvestment in education will especially help high-poverty districts
Many of the proven strategies described above are especially important for low-income students and students of color that face extra challenges. In addition, because of the way the SEEK formula is designed, new dollars go disproportionately to the poorest districts that have less capacity to raise resources locally and often have higher rates of student need. The table below illustrates the potential gain to districts that would see the largest per pupil increase in spending as a result of this plan.
| Lowest-Wealth Districts Would Benefit Disproportionately | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total SEEK Increase | What that makes possible | ||||
| Additional dollars to district | Additional per pupil | Educator raise | Additional teachers and other certified staff | Funds for other needs | |
| Wolfe County | $1,302,697 | $1,317 | 10% | 6 | $130,270 |
| Breathitt County | $1,725,670 | $1,278 | 9% | 9 | $172,567 |
| Jenkins Independent | $493,104 | $1,261 | 8% | 3 | $49,310 |
| Jackson County | $2,080,737 | $1,261 | 10% | 10 | $208,074 |
| Owsley County | $677,629 | $1,248 | 9% | 3 | $67,763 |
| Leslie County | $1,626,768 | $1,247 | 9% | 8 | $162,677 |
| Whitley County | $4,429,764 | $1,243 | 11% | 20 | $442,976 |
| Clay County | $2,891,167 | $1,242 | 9% | 14 | $289,117 |
| Magoffin County | $1,936,622 | $1,225 | 10% | 10 | $193,662 |
| Harlan County | $3,410,719 | $1,218 | 9% | 17 | $341,072 |
See below for a map that provides the potential benefits for all districts. At the end of the report is a table with the same information, and district fact sheets are available at this link.
In contrast, income tax cuts go overwhelmingly to the wealthy
Kentucky has already cut the income tax rate by 1.5 percentage points, costing the state $2.15 billion annually and primarily benefiting the wealthy. Approximately two-thirds of reductions in the state income tax Kentucky flow to the wealthiest 20% of people, as shown in the chart below. The richest 1% of Kentuckians, who make at least $610,200 a year, receive 29% of all income tax cuts. The lowest-income 60% of Kentuckians, in contrast, receive just 19% of the cuts.

That means the richest 1% of Kentuckians receive an average of $5,001 year from each half point reduction in the income tax, while working class Kentuckians may receive enough for one oil change or a cable bill each year, as shown in the graph below. People below the poverty line will receive no benefit at all because of an existing low-income credit meant to partially offset the cost of regressive sales taxes, and all but high-income seniors won’t benefit because of laws that already exempt Social Security and the first $31,110 of retirement income from the income tax.

While the rich will get wealthier from income tax cuts, most Kentuckians will be disproportionately harmed by future budget shortfalls that will mean poorer schools, reduced access to health care, outdated infrastructure, higher fees of various kinds and more.
For just 1/3 of the legislature’s commitment to recent tax cuts, Kentucky could step forward in public education
Kentucky was a leader in public education following the passage of the Kentucky Education Reform Act (KERA) of 1990 and the associated increase in taxes that allowed greater investment in public schools. But since that time, and especially following the Great Recession in 2008, the state has lost significant ground as funding has not kept up. In recent years, strong pandemic stimulus resulted in a substantial bump in state tax revenue that made reinvestment possible. But the legislature’s top priority instead has been cuts to the individual income tax that disproportionately benefit the wealthy few. Appropriating just 1/3 of the amount given away in tax cuts in recent years to education would begin to put Kentucky back on the right track for its public schools and the quality education that all kids need and deserve.
| Revenues and Investments in 2027 Made Possible from Additional Seek Investment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total SEEK Increase | What that makes possible | ||||
| Additional dollars to district | Additional per pupil | Educator raise | Additional teachers and other certified staff | Funds for other needs | |
| Adair County | $2,430,644 | $1,082 | 10% | 3 | $243,064 |
| Allen County | $3,099,270 | $1,099 | 11% | 14 | $309,927 |
| Anchorage Independent | $281,225 | $713 | 3% | 1 | $28,123 |
| Anderson County | $3,100,218 | $951 | 9% | 15 | $310,022 |
| Ashland Independent | $2,784,513 | $1,052 | 9% | 14 | $278,451 |
| Augusta Independent | $296,030 | $1,028 | 8% | 2 | $29,603 |
| Ballard County | $831,399 | $1,044 | 7% | 4 | $83,140 |
| Barbourville Independent | $623,547 | $945 | 9% | 3 | $62,355 |
| Bardstown Independent | $2,361,056 | $1,025 | 8% | 10 | $236,106 |
| Barren County | $4,511,868 | $1,043 | 8% | 20 | $451,187 |
| Bath County | $1,824,426 | $1,106 | 10% | 9 | $182,443 |
| Beechwood Independent | $1,096,448 | $750 | 6% | 5 | $109,645 |
| Bell County | $2,429,709 | $1,178 | 9% | 11 | $242,971 |
| Bellevue Independent | $385,922 | $849 | 5% | 2 | $38,592 |
| Berea Independent | $966,235 | $1,142 | 8% | 4 | $96,624 |
| Boone County | $18,288,490 | $963 | 7% | 76 | $1,828,849 |
| Bourbon County | $2,099,094 | $965 | 9% | 10 | $209,909 |
| Bowling Green Independent | $4,374,976 | $1,023 | 8% | 20 | $437,498 |
| Boyd County | $2,585,867 | $1,069 | 8% | 12 | $258,587 |
| Boyle County | $2,736,710 | $988 | 9% | 12 | $273,671 |
| Bracken County | $1,153,978 | $1,138 | 10% | 6 | $115,398 |
| Breathitt County | $1,725,670 | $1,278 | 9% | 9 | $172,567 |
| Breckinridge County | $2,623,616 | $1,124 | 10% | 12 | $262,362 |
| Bullitt County | $11,104,054 | $949 | 8% | 47 | $1,110,405 |
| Burgin Independent | $405,705 | $886 | 8% | 2 | $40,571 |
| Butler County | $2,224,407 | $1,141 | 11% | 11 | $222,441 |
| Caldwell County | $1,728,064 | $1,058 | 10% | 8 | $172,806 |
| Calloway County | $2,719,732 | $981 | 9% | 12 | $271,973 |
| Campbell County | $4,745,219 | $1,023 | 8% | 21 | $474,522 |
| Campbellsville Independent | $1,227,694 | $1,029 | 9% | 6 | $122,769 |
| Carlisle County | $679,381 | $1,138 | 9% | 4 | $67,938 |
| Carroll County | $1,780,705 | $1,082 | 8% | 8 | $178,071 |
| Carter County | $3,832,262 | $1,107 | 10% | 18 | $383,226 |
| Casey County | $2,208,770 | $1,150 | 11% | 11 | $220,877 |
| Caverna Independent | $576,889 | $1,089 | 8% | 3 | $57,689 |
| Christian County | $7,851,892 | $1,066 | 10% | 41 | $785,189 |
| Clark County | $4,823,003 | $1,031 | 9% | 23 | $482,300 |
| Clay County | $2,891,167 | $1,242 | 9% | 14 | $289,117 |
| Clinton County | $1,421,251 | $1,114 | 9% | 7 | $142,125 |
| Corbin Independent | $2,677,863 | $995 | 9% | 12 | $267,786 |
| Covington Independent | $3,099,340 | $1,051 | 7% | 15 | $309,934 |
| Crittenden County | $1,352,833 | $1,114 | 11% | 7 | $135,283 |
| Cumberland County | $1,006,023 | $1,141 | 10% | 5 | $100,602 |
| Danville Independent | $1,567,072 | $1,050 | 7% | 7 | $156,707 |
| Daviess County | $9,890,780 | $1,009 | 8% | 44 | $989,078 |
| Dawson Springs Independent | $565,338 | $1,098 | 9% | 3 | $56,534 |
| Dayton Independent | $716,371 | $999 | 7% | 3 | $71,637 |
| East Bernstadt Independent | $423,169 | $962 | 9% | 2 | $42,317 |
| Edmonson County | $1,703,602 | $1,098 | 10% | 9 | $170,360 |
| Elizabethtown Independent | $2,258,250 | $986 | 8% | 10 | $225,825 |
| Elliott County | $939,323 | $1,178 | 10% | 5 | $93,932 |
| Eminence Independent | $855,832 | $953 | 8% | 5 | $85,583 |
| Erlanger-Elsmere Independent | $1,889,076 | $906 | 7% | 9 | $188,908 |
| Estill County | $2,012,089 | $1,114 | 11% | 10 | $201,209 |
| Fairview Independent | $516,298 | $1,166 | 7% | 3 | $51,630 |
| Fayette County | $35,905,279 | $940 | 6% | 137 | $3,590,528 |
| Fleming County | $2,044,287 | $1,052 | 10% | 11 | $204,429 |
| Floyd County | $5,119,310 | $1,102 | 10% | 26 | $511,931 |
| Fort Thomas Independent | $2,299,052 | $758 | 6% | 9 | $229,905 |
| Frankfort Independent | $817,107 | $984 | 8% | 4 | $81,711 |
| Franklin County | $5,587,541 | $1,057 | 8% | 26 | $558,754 |
| Fulton County | $584,866 | $1,088 | 7% | 3 | $58,487 |
| Fulton Independent | $275,219 | $1,087 | 7% | 2 | $27,522 |
| Gallatin County | $1,258,642 | $997 | 7% | 6 | $125,864 |
| Garrard County | $2,282,975 | $1,030 | 9% | 11 | $228,298 |
| Glasgow Independent | $2,227,747 | $1,020 | 9% | 10 | $222,775 |
| Grant County | $3,030,471 | $1,125 | 9% | 16 | $303,047 |
| Graves County | $3,668,774 | $1,012 | 10% | 18 | $366,877 |
| Grayson County | $3,784,010 | $1,070 | 10% | 18 | $378,401 |
| Green County | $1,697,548 | $1,160 | 9% | 8 | $169,755 |
| Greenup County | $2,367,903 | $1,124 | 8% | 12 | $236,790 |
| Hancock County | $1,329,411 | $1,008 | 7% | 6 | $132,941 |
| Hardin County | $13,590,878 | $1,062 | 9% | 60 | $1,359,088 |
| Harlan County | $3,410,719 | $1,218 | 9% | 17 | $341,072 |
| Harlan Independent | $806,114 | $1,061 | 10% | 4 | $80,611 |
| Harrison County | $2,857,743 | $1,065 | 10% | 13 | $285,774 |
| Hart County | $2,262,769 | $1,129 | 9% | 11 | $226,277 |
| Hazard Independent | $896,815 | $1,049 | 8% | 4 | $89,682 |
| Henderson County | $5,982,946 | $1,061 | 8% | 28 | $598,295 |
| Henry County | $1,852,777 | $1,068 | 9% | 9 | $185,278 |
| Hickman County | $735,540 | $1,195 | 10% | 4 | $73,554 |
| Hopkins County | $5,905,447 | $1,051 | 9% | 29 | $590,545 |
| Jackson County | $2,080,737 | $1,261 | 10% | 10 | $208,074 |
| Jackson Independent | $316,648 | $1,015 | 9% | 2 | $31,665 |
| Jefferson County | $82,699,718 | $1,009 | 6% | 304 | $8,269,972 |
| Jenkins Independent | $493,104 | $1,261 | 8% | 3 | $49,310 |
| Jessamine County | $7,706,618 | $1,030 | 8% | 34 | $770,662 |
| Johnson County | $3,315,550 | $1,169 | 9% | 16 | $331,555 |
| Kenton County | $12,492,939 | $983 | 8% | 52 | $1,249,294 |
| Knott County | $2,014,518 | $1,164 | 9% | 10 | $201,452 |
| Knox County | $3,823,356 | $1,176 | 9% | 19 | $382,336 |
| LaRue County | $2,383,400 | $1,112 | 11% | 10 | $238,340 |
| Laurel County | $8,310,186 | $1,073 | 10% | 38 | $831,019 |
| Lawrence County | $2,194,019 | $1,119 | 10% | 11 | $219,402 |
| Lee County | $874,563 | $1,117 | 11% | 5 | $87,456 |
| Leslie County | $1,626,768 | $1,247 | 9% | 8 | $162,677 |
| Letcher County | $2,505,370 | $1,160 | 8% | 12 | $250,537 |
| Lewis County | $1,983,835 | $1,146 | 10% | 10 | $198,384 |
| Lincoln County | $3,201,773 | $1,130 | 10% | 16 | $320,177 |
| Livingston County | $956,423 | $1,040 | 8% | 4 | $95,642 |
| Logan County | $3,275,197 | $1,082 | 10% | 16 | $327,520 |
| Ludlow Independent | $677,189 | $915 | 7% | 3 | $67,719 |
| Lyon County | $819,529 | $937 | 8% | 4 | $81,953 |
| Madison County | $7,546,177 | $1,030 | 6% | 34 | $754,618 |
| Magoffin County | $1,936,622 | $1,225 | 10% | 10 | $193,662 |
| Marion County | $2,888,265 | $1,039 | 9% | 13 | $288,826 |
| Marshall County | $3,820,565 | $985 | 8% | 17 | $382,056 |
| Martin County | $1,640,843 | $1,132 | 9% | 8 | $164,084 |
| Mason County | $2,430,444 | $1,095 | 9% | 11 | $243,044 |
| Mayfield Independent | $1,865,800 | $1,093 | 7% | 9 | $186,580 |
| McCracken County | $6,072,384 | $985 | 9% | 27 | $607,238 |
| McCreary County | $2,714,141 | $1,205 | 10% | 14 | $271,414 |
| McLean County | $1,283,526 | $1,046 | 9% | 6 | $128,353 |
| Meade County | $4,581,443 | $1,041 | 9% | 20 | $458,144 |
| Menifee County | $1,025,146 | $1,161 | 10% | 5 | $102,515 |
| Mercer County | $2,632,842 | $1,116 | 9% | 11 | $263,284 |
| Metcalfe County | $1,284,857 | $1,115 | 9% | 6 | $128,486 |
| Middlesboro Independent | $1,066,100 | $1,159 | 10% | 5 | $106,610 |
| Monroe County | $1,784,111 | $1,118 | 9% | 9 | $178,411 |
| Montgomery County | $4,099,181 | $1,074 | 10% | 20 | $409,918 |
| Morgan County | $1,867,924 | $1,186 | 10% | 9 | $186,792 |
| Muhlenberg County | $4,204,307 | $1,065 | 8% | 20 | $420,431 |
| Murray Independent | $1,723,305 | $945 | 9% | 8 | $172,330 |
| Nelson County | $3,602,018 | $963 | 7% | 17 | $360,202 |
| Newport Independent | $1,092,336 | $941 | 5% | 5 | $109,234 |
| Nicholas County | $1,018,641 | $1,075 | 10% | 5 | $101,864 |
| Ohio County | $3,614,306 | $1,095 | 9% | 17 | $361,431 |
| Oldham County | $10,662,895 | $951 | 7% | 51 | $1,066,289 |
| Owen County | $1,593,907 | $1,074 | 9% | 8 | $159,391 |
| Owensboro Independent | $4,561,428 | $1,019 | 8% | 20 | $456,143 |
| Owsley County | $677,629 | $1,248 | 9% | 3 | $67,763 |
| Paducah Independent | $2,502,185 | $1,001 | 7% | 11 | $250,219 |
| Paintsville Independent | $645,909 | $936 | 7% | 3 | $64,591 |
| Paris Independent | $713,792 | $1,060 | 9% | 4 | $71,379 |
| Pendleton County | $2,058,289 | $1,125 | 8% | 10 | $205,829 |
| Perry County | $3,430,079 | $1,183 | 9% | 16 | $343,008 |
| Pike County | $7,073,722 | $1,051 | 8% | 34 | $707,372 |
| Pikeville Independent | $926,971 | $868 | 7% | 4 | $92,697 |
| Pineville Independent | $507,299 | $1,115 | 9% | 3 | $50,730 |
| Powell County | $1,971,393 | $1,093 | 9% | 10 | $197,139 |
| Pulaski County | $6,585,507 | $1,042 | 9% | 33 | $658,551 |
| Raceland Independent | $966,684 | $986 | 9% | 5 | $96,668 |
| Robertson County | $462,044 | $1,179 | 9% | 2 | $46,204 |
| Rockcastle County | $2,842,565 | $1,161 | 11% | 14 | $284,256 |
| Rowan County | $3,009,821 | $1,017 | 9% | 15 | $300,982 |
| Russell County | $2,875,496 | $1,096 | 10% | 14 | $287,550 |
| Russell Independent | $1,814,817 | $994 | 9% | 8 | $181,482 |
| Russellville Independent | $977,759 | $1,085 | 8% | 5 | $97,776 |
| Science Hill Independent | $514,343 | $1,045 | 11% | 3 | $51,434 |
| Scott County | $8,878,186 | $1,004 | 8% | 40 | $887,819 |
| Shelby County | $6,334,663 | $998 | 8% | 30 | $633,466 |
| Simpson County | $2,797,445 | $1,010 | 8% | 12 | $279,745 |
| Somerset Independent | $1,505,645 | $943 | 8% | 7 | $150,565 |
| Southgate Independent | $147,384 | $925 | 5% | 1 | $14,738 |
| Spencer County | $3,127,041 | $1,034 | 9% | 14 | $312,704 |
| Taylor County | $2,516,140 | $1,068 | 9% | 12 | $251,614 |
| Todd County | $1,773,115 | $1,129 | 9% | 10 | $177,311 |
| Trigg County | $1,829,984 | $1,039 | 8% | 9 | $182,998 |
| Trimble County | $1,057,462 | $1,055 | 8% | 5 | $105,746 |
| Union County | $1,964,165 | $1,084 | 9% | 10 | $196,416 |
| Walton Verona Independent | $1,640,080 | $959 | 7% | 8 | $164,008 |
| Warren County | $17,339,524 | $1,011 | 9% | 78 | $1,733,952 |
| Washington County | $1,691,836 | $1,077 | 9% | 7 | $169,184 |
| Wayne County | $3,097,521 | $1,150 | 10% | 16 | $309,752 |
| Webster County | $2,074,398 | $1,114 | 10% | 11 | $207,440 |
| Whitley County | $4,429,764 | $1,243 | 11% | 20 | $442,976 |
| Williamsburg Independent | $741,185 | $1,029 | 9% | 4 | $74,119 |
| Williamstown Independent | $699,375 | $958 | 8% | 4 | $69,937 |
| Wolfe County | $1,302,697 | $1,317 | 10% | 6 | $130,270 |
| Woodford County | $3,367,502 | $936 | 8% | 16 | $336,750 |
| Total/State-Wide Average | $594,578,678 | $1,028 | 8% | 2,658 | $59,457,868 |
| Source: KyPolicy analysis of Kentucky Department of Education data. The actual allocation of the additional SEEK funds in this scenario would be at the discretion of the school district. Table omits Cloverport Independent due to anomalies from its virtual school. | |||||
Methodology
Increases are compared against a baseline of 2026 SEEK forecast data and assume the same SEEK variables for 2027. Estimates use a base SEEK per pupil level of $5,212, 100% funding of SEEK transportation, a Tier 1 rate of 17.5%, a SEEK Tier 1 equalization level of $1,211,000 and other SEEK add-on levels that were used in the 2024-2026 Budget of the Commonwealth.
Examples of what the proposed extra funding makes possible assume 60% of extra SEEK funds go to raises for classified and certified employees, 30% goes to hiring additional certified staff, and 10% goes to other district needs.
The estimates for additional number of certified staff are derived using average teacher salary for the district in 2025 adjusted by 3% inflation for 2026 and the salary increase estimated for each district as described below. While using average salaries likely overestimates the starting salaries of hiring additional staff, average salaries are used to take into account potential new facility, supervision, training and other costs.
We estimate salary costs assuming that 82% of state and local spending is for personnel, the state-wide share reported in the 2022-2023 School Report Card.20 State and local spending for 2024 is used and then adjusted by 3% inflation for two additional years to get 2026 baseline estimates against which raises are applied. These numbers were also compared and found to closely resemble Kentucky Department of Education data on total salaries paid for classified and professional staff as obtained through an open records request. Estimates assume that 74% of personnel expenses go to salary plus the portion of benefits paid by school districts based on an analysis of these costs.
The total of $718 million in state costs includes $85 million in additional state retirement and health insurance expenses associated with the hiring of additional staff and employee raises included in the example scenario, an estimate which is also based on the state normal cost for retiree pensions and health benefits and the per employee per year health insurance costs for employers reported by the Kentucky Employees Health Plan.21
- Fiscal Note to HB 1, 2025 Regular Session of the Kentucky General Assembly, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/recorddocuments/note/25RS/hb1/FN.pdf.
- Council for Better Education, “Back on Track Report,” https://www.kycbe.org/back-on-track. Council for Better Education, “School Funding Studies,” https://www.kycbe.org/reports. $206 million is the average annual increase in Department of Education budgeted General Fund expenditures for 2025 and 2026.
- Northwestern University Institute for Policy Research, “The Benefits of Increased School Spending,” March 2017, https://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/documents/policy-briefs/school-spending-policy-research-brief-Jackson.pdf. Carme Martin, et al., “A Quality Approach to School Funding,” Center for American Progress, Nov. 13, 2018, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/quality-approach-school-funding/. C. Kirabo Jackson and Claire L. Mackevicius, “What Impacts Can We Expect from School Spending Policy? Evidence from Evaluations in the United States,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, January 2024, https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/app.20220279. Hosung Sohn, et al., “The Effect of Extra School Funding on Students’ Academic Achievements Under a Centralized School Financing System,” Education Finance and Policy, 2023, https://direct.mit.edu/edfp/article/18/1/1/109966/The-Effect-of-Extra-School-Funding-on-Students.
- C. Kirabo Jackson, et al., “The Effects of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from School Finance Reforms,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Feb. 2016, https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/131/1/157/2461148?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false.
- Ashley Spalding, “Education Funding in Kentucky Remains Inadequate, Inequitable and Uncertain as Kids Head Back to School,” Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, August 13, 2025, https://kypolicy.org/education-funding-in-kentucky-remains-inadequate-inequitable-and-uncertain-as-kids-head-back-to-school/. Jason Bailey, et al., “The Funding Gap Between Kentucky’s Wealthy and Poor School Districts Is Now Worse than Levels Declared Unconstitutional,” Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, Aug. 23, 2023, https://kypolicy.org/kentucky-school-funding-returns-to-pre-kera-levels/.
- National Education Association, Educator Pay in America 2025,” https://www.nea.org/resource-library/educator-pay-and-student-spending-how-does-your-state-rank.
- Dustin Pugel, “Teacher Pay Remains 20%Less Than 2008 Despite Small Gain in 2025 School Year,” Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, January 6, 2025, https://kypolicy.org/teacher-pay-remains-20-less-than-2008-despite-small-gain-in-2025-school-year/.
- Jason Bailey, “Kentucky Teacher Pensions Are Getting Smaller,” Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, June 16, 2025, https://kypolicy.org/kentucky-teacher-pensions-are-getting-smaller/.
- Legislative Research Commission Office of Education Accountability, “Kentucky Public School Employee Staffing Shortages,” November 1, 2023, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/CommitteeDocuments/117/26654/01Nov2023%20-%203%20-%20OEA%20Staffing%20Shortages.pdf. Jason Bailey, “State Report Describes Growing Educator Shortage, and Lack of Funding Plays a Key Role,” Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, November 3, 2023, https://kypolicy.org/state-report-on-kentucky-teacher-shortage/.
- D. W. Schanzenbach, “The Economics of Class Size,” The Economics of Education 2nd Edition, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128153918000239?via%3Dihub.
- Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, “Does Class Size Matter,” National Educaiton Policy Center, February 2014, https://www.greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Schanzenbach_ClassSize.pdf.
- Ashley Spalding, “State Budget Cuts to Education Hurt Kentucky’s Classrooms and Kids,” Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, Jan. 2018, https://kypolicy.org/state-budget-cuts-education-hurt-kentuckys-classrooms-kids/.
- Office of the State School Security Marshal, 2023-2024 Annual Report, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c6ff8fe704680322ef00e02/t/66cf6f7381bd3b745becfe83/1724870516651/2023-24+OSSSM+Annual+Report_WEB.pdf.
- Food Research and Action Center, “School Meals Are Essential for Student Health and Learning,” May 2021, https://frac.org/wp-content/uploads/School-Meals-are-Essential-Health-and-Learning.pdf.
- Feeding America, “Food Insecurity Among the Child Population in Kentucky,” 2023, https://map.feedingamerica.org/county/2023/child/kentucky.
- Jessica Klein, “New Federal Rule Extends Free School Meals to Nearly All Kentucky Students,” October 13, 2023, https://kypolicy.org/free-school-lunch-expansion-in-kentucky/.
- Krista Johnson, “SNAP Cuts Could Have Big Impact in Kentucky, Including in Its Schools,” The Courier-Journal, July 9, 2025, https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/local/2025/07/09/how-snap-cuts-could-impact-kentucky-residents-schools/84242486007/.
- Kentucky Student Voice Team v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, https://kentuckylantern.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Complaint-01-14-25-final.pdf.
- Legislative Research Commission Office of Education Accountability, “Kentucky Public School Employee Staffing Shortages.” Bailey, “State Report Describes Growing Educator Shortage, and Lack of Funding Plays a Key Role.”
- https://www.education.ky.gov/Open-House/data/Pages/Historical_SRC_Datasets_Financial_Transparency.aspx
- Jason Bailey, “Why the Legislature May Change What’s in the SEEK Formula,” Kentucky Center for Economic Policy, March 4, 2025, https://kypolicy.org/sb-6-seek-changes/. Teachers’ Retirement System of Kentucky, Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2024 and 2023, https://trs.ky.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024-TRS-ACFR-Final.pdf. Kentucky Employees’ Health Plan (KEHP) 2024 Annual Report, https://extranet.personnel.ky.gov/KGHIB/Annual%202024%20Report.pdf.



