• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy

Kentucky Center for Economic Policy

   

  • About Us
  • Press Room
  • Donate

Research That Works for Kentucky

  • Topics
    • Budget & Tax
    • Criminal Justice
    • Economic Security
    • Education
    • Health Care
    • Jobs & The Economy
  • Types
    • News
    • Op-Ed
    • Research

   

  • About Us
  • Press Room
  • Donate

Copyright © 2022 KyPolicy Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Sitemap

Op-Ed

State Must Face Pension Debt

Jason Bailey | September 30, 2012

Over the last several years, much of the focus given to Kentucky’s pension system has been on ways to shift new employees into some version of a 401(k)-style retirement plan. But as a presentation to the state’s pension task force recently showed, that idea has little or nothing to do with the state’s main challenge on this issue: how to pay back the existing unfunded liability.

Consultants hired by the state from the Pew and Arnold foundations presented preliminary information to the task force on the impact of various options of dealing with the liability. All of the options that cut pension benefits for employees barely made a dent in the problem.

More On Budget & Tax: Kentucky Must Do More to Increase Flood Resilience

That’s because the unfunded liability is for benefits already earned by existing employees and retirees — benefits that are both legally and morally obligated to them. Cutting benefits moving forward won’t make that debt any smaller.

Also, as the Pew Foundation’s David Draine noted, the employer costs for new employees under the current pension plan are already “relatively modest,” especially after cuts and shifts in costs to employees were made in 2008. Draine said that “seeking meaningful savings from a new plan is not possible.”

That is demonstrated in a chart from the presentation showing that the state costs for new employees would be basically the same under the existing system as under three different types of plans that include a 401(k)-type component.

The only options Pew and Arnold presented that truly address the liability involve the state making bigger contributions to the system. The consultants noted that the option of eliminating the income tax exclusion on all retirement income — which the governor’s blue ribbon tax reform commission is currently considering — and dedicating that revenue to the pension system until it is fully funded would reduce the liability by $7.5 billion.

Pew and Arnold noted that “the funding gap facing Kentucky is so large that even with an implausibly aggressive attempt to curtail benefits, costs would remain substantial.” They stated that “ultimately, more money will need to be put into the system to pay for the commonwealth’s pension problems.”

Many in Frankfort have wanted to dodge the fact that the pension issue is in fact primarily a revenue challenge. For most of the last 20 years, the state essentially borrowed from workers’ retirements to avoid making needed tax reforms while limiting some of the impact of a failing tax system on the state budget. Despite reforms passed in 2008, the state is still not making its full required contribution to the pension system, which means we’ll be paying much more in future years unless we come up with more revenue.

The state now spends over $12 billion a year through various tax exemptions and preferences — more than it spends on the entire state budget. Tax provisions are regularly passed by the General Assembly and then never revisited to ask if they are worth the lost revenue. They now seriously impinge on the state’s ability to fund needed services — and provide decent benefits to its employees.

Some pension task force members are recognizing that this issue is mostly about revenue. Rep. Brent Yonts talked about the need to merge the recommendations of the task force with ideas to raise new revenue coming out of the governor’s tax reform commission.

Let’s hope that the meeting was the first step toward focusing this issue on the real problem at hand.

Published in State Journal, Frankfort, September 30, 2012.

FacebookTweetLinkedInEmail

Primary Sidebar

Get KyPolicy news updates in your inbox

Sign Up

Sidebar

Perspectives

Let’s Learn From Braidy, and Seek More Answers From Each Other

State Workers Help Us All; It’s Past Time to Help Them Too

Public Resources Should Stay in Public Schools

For Kentuckians Facing Hunger, This Summer Brings a Triple Threat

Addressing Corporate Power Is Key to Tackling Inflation

Other Budget & Tax Items

aluminum cans

Op-Ed

Let’s Learn From Braidy, and Seek More Answers From Each Other

HB 8 op ed featured image

Op-Ed

House Tax Bill Would Wreck Kentucky’s Budget to Benefit the Wealthy

Shift Shaft Tax Policy graphic

Op-Ed

Shift and Shaft Tax Policy Is No Way to Prosper

Ky. Policy

Footer

Research that works for Kentucky

433 Chestnut Street, Berea, KY 40403

Phone: 859-756-4605

General information and inquiries: info@kypolicy.org

   

Help us make the facts free and accessible to everyone. That’s how Kentucky will thrive.

Donate

  • Topics
    • Budget & Tax
    • Criminal Justice
    • Economic Security
    • Education
    • Health Care
    • Jobs & The Economy
  • Work
    • News
    • Op-Ed
    • Research
  • About Us
  • Press Room
  • Contact

Get KyPolicy news updates in your inbox

Sign Up

Copyright © 2022 KyPolicy Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Sitemap

made by P&P
Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!