• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Kentucky Center for Economic Policy

Kentucky Center for Economic Policy

      

  • About Us
  • Press Room
  • Donate

Research That Works for Kentucky

  • Topics
    • Budget & Tax
    • Criminal Justice
    • Economic Security
    • Education
    • Health Care
    • Jobs & The Economy
  • Types
    • News
    • Op-Ed
    • Research

      

  • About Us
  • Press Room
  • Donate

Copyright © 2025 KyPolicy Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Sitemap

Op-Ed

Bills Would Worsen Troubles for Kentuckians Who Get Laid Off

Dustin Pugel | February 20, 2019

New legislative proposals would cut Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits for people who lose their jobs through no fault of their own by as much as 40 percent.

The identical proposals, House Bill 317 and Senate Bill 171, would slash benefits in four ways:

More On Jobs & The Economy: Kentuckians Need a New Trade Policy, Not a Chaotic Trade War

  • By cutting the allowable weeks of benefits from 26 to 20. Only a handful of states provide less than 26 weeks. And though only a third of Kentucky claimants are unemployed for that long, they are more likely to live in economically distressed communities and need more time to find a suitable new job.
  • Cutting the benefit amount by 25 percent every five weeks.
  • Cutting the weekly benefit rate by 11.5 percent, reducing the benefit for laid-off Kentuckians at every income level.
  • Slowing the growth of Kentucky’s maximum benefit amount, hampering the program’s ability to keep pace with cost increases in the broader economy.

For the typical claimant, the cumulative result of the first three changes would add up to a cut of 20.4 percent, or $1,318.

By decreasing unemployment benefits, Kentucky is really cutting a lifeline to the workforce. UI cuts would make it harder for people to search for a job in their career field that matches their skill set and level of experience, ultimately forcing them into jobs for which they are overqualified. Cutting UI also hamstrings our ability to recover after an economic downturn since these benefits are one of the most powerful anti-recession tools we have. Instead of making the program recession-ready, we’d be making economic downturns deeper and more painful.

Special interest groups vying to cut the already small tax businesses pay in Kentucky toward UI (0.6 percent of total wages on average) are shooting themselves in the foot. Employers who need to match skilled workers to available positions won’t benefit from laws that push workers into the next position at Starbucks or Dollar General because their UI benefits dried up too soon.

And though some claim these proposals are about cutting back too-generous benefits, the state-wide average weekly benefit amount ($340.66) is already just 27 percent of what a 2-parent, 2-child household in Montgomery County, for instance, needs for a modest but secure standard of living. Only one in five unemployed Kentuckians even receive UI benefits to begin with. Though modest, these benefits help Kentuckians get by and lessen the risk of losing their apartment or cutting the power while getting back on their feet.

Of course, cutting holes in the safety net will hurt some people more than others. Kentuckians of color facing discrimination in labor markets and other race-based barriers to employment will be hurt more by cuts to UI than white Kentuckians. And a shortage of jobs in rural Kentucky means it takes longer for people to find new work who were laid off in industries like manufacturing and coal mining; cutting UI will further undermine these families’ and communities’ ability to weather hard times.

Unemployment Insurance is one of the most effective tools we have to keep workers in their field of expertise, combat economic hardship and keep our economy moving forward. There is no need to make cuts or hamstring our workers now, or our ability to dig out of a downturn in the future. Lawmakers should support Kentucky workers and communities by maintaining the integrity of UI, and rejecting these radical and harmful proposals.

This op-ed ran in the Northern Kentucky Tribune on February 23, 2019.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

FacebookTweetLinkedInEmail

Primary Sidebar

Get KyPolicy news updates in your inbox

Sign Up

Sidebar

Perspectives

Slashing Federal Programs Would Deal Another Blow to Rural Kentuckians

Kentuckians Need a New Trade Policy, Not a Chaotic Trade War

Kentucky Voters Buried Private School Vouchers. One More Idea Must Die to Truly Reinvest in Our Public Schools

Our Leaders Should Give Thanks to Food Assistance, Not Deplete It

A Warning for Kentucky From the Devastating Impact of Vouchers on Arizona, Florida Public Schools

Other Jobs & The Economy Items

Kentuckians Need a New Trade Policy, Not a Chaotic Trade War

Op-Ed

Kentuckians Need a New Trade Policy, Not a Chaotic Trade War

Kentuckys Kids Dont Need Us to Drag Child Labor Laws Back to the 19th Century

Op-Ed

Kentucky’s Kids Don’t Need Us to Drag Child Labor Laws Back to the 19th Century

The Right to a Break Is Just One of the Worker Freedoms on the Line

Op-Ed

The Right to a Break Is Just One of the Worker Freedoms on the Line

Ky. Policy

Footer

Research that works for Kentucky

433 Chestnut Street, Berea, KY 40403

859-756-4605

General information and inquiries: info@kypolicy.org

     

Help us make the facts free and accessible to everyone. That’s how Kentucky will thrive.

Donate

  • Topics
    • Budget & Tax
    • Criminal Justice
    • Economic Security
    • Education
    • Health Care
    • Jobs & The Economy
  • Work
    • News
    • Op-Ed
    • Research
  • About Us
  • Press Room
  • Contact

Get KyPolicy news updates in your inbox

Sign Up

Copyright © 2025 KyPolicy Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Sitemap

made by P&P
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok